Evaluation+Rubric

** (liberally borrowed from Cinema Veriteen Rubric, Spires, Hervey, Morris, & Stelpflug, 2010) **
 * English III Shakespeare Is Still Relevant Project DRAFT Rubric **

Prose Commentary ||   4   ||   3   ||   2   ||  1 || 4  ||  3  ||   2  ||   1  ||
 * Clear Purpose || Establishes and maintains a clear focus throughout || Establishes and generally maintains a clear focus || Establishes a clear focus, but there are a few lapses in focus. || No clear purpose is discernable. ||
 * Cohesion and coherence of ideas || All examples/arguments clearly exhibit/support 21st century relevancy. || Examples/arguments exhibit/support 21st century relevancy. || Examples somewhat exhibit/support 21st century relevancy. || Examples are random and do not exhibit or support 21stcentury relevancy. ||
 * Mechanics/composition Skills || 0-1 errors; complete sentences with a varied complexity; correct tenses and punctuation; good word order and a diverse word choice || 2-3 errors; complete sentences with some complexity; mostly correct tenses and punctuation; good word order and choice || 4-5 errors; complete sentences with little structural variety; frequent errors in tense and punctuation; word order questionable with little variety of word choice || 6+ errors; weak sentence structure; many tense errors; poor word order and simplistic word choice ||
 * Source Citations || Source information collected and all documented in MLA format. || Source information collected and most documented in MLA format. || Source information collected but not documented in MLA format. || Very little or no source information was collected. ||
 * Multimedia Presentation ||
 * Image quality || Video and images are compelling and of high quality. Images clearly support content. || Video and images are of high quality. Images clearly support content. || Some video and images are of high quality. Some images clearly support content. || Video and images are not of high quality. Images do not support content. ||
 * Editing/Accuracy || The presentation contains no scripting errors and has seamless flow between different elements. || The presentation contains no scripting errors and has a smooth flow between different elements. || The presentation contains few scripting errors but does not have a smooth interface between different elements. || The presentation contains many scripting errors and has a rough distracting interface between different elements. ||
 * Audio (Music & Dialogue) || Consistency in presentation; clearly articulated narration; music is appropriate to presentation and perfectly fits tone of images || Consistency in presentation; clear narration; music fits tone of images || Some consistency in presentation; lapses in clarity of narration; music is evident || Breaking consistency; monotone style of presentation; inappropriate use of music ||
 * Creativity/Originality || Product shows a large amount of original thought. Ideas are creative and inventive. || Product shows some original thought. Work shows new ideas and insights. || Uses other people’s ideas (giving them credit), but there is little evidence of original thinking. || Uses other people’s ideas, but does not give them credit. ||